Kermit Gosnell Is Not The Only Guilty Party

May 14, 2013

This should be read folks! It’s about time someone said this out loud.

Army Vet Chic: Me & My Big Mouth

In a perfect world, abortion wouldn’t be legal or wanted because those consenting adults that create a life would accept that responsibility and respect the innocence of what they created. But, it’s not a perfect world and most don’t accept that responsibility, thus abortion is among us, like it or not. However, there are some things I think the abortion rights advocates are ignoring when it comes to situations like those that resulted in the prosecution of Kermit Gosnell. Good ol’ Kermit isn’t the only guilty party. He had help.

Since Gosnell has now been convicted of more than 230 criminal charges, including felony murder, infanticide, and manslaughter, I think it is only fair that we begin the process of identifying and prosecuting those that put those innocent babies into Gosnell’s hands. In any other murder trial, anyone who aids a person in the act of committing a felony would…

View original post 1,813 more words

President ‘Pants On The Ground’

July 12, 2011

At the 22 minute mark of the Presidents press conference on 11 July 2011, an American president (Barack Obama) provided the most damning evidence that he truly is a Marxist in the same fashion as Stalin, Mao, Castro and Chavez. Watch the video for yourself, and read the transcript below. This man MUST be stopped, and his goals and plans MUST be destroyed if we as Americans intend to remain a Free and Independent people.
See the VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO34jERiMfw (move the video slider to about 21:57, and just listen)
Transcript: (with commentary by me inserted in parentheses) p.s. when you see the word ‘revenue’…replace it with the word ‘confiscate, or confiscation’.
President:
Now, what I will say is, is that the revenue (confiscation) components that we’ve discussed would be significant and would target folks who can most afford it. (So Barack Obama and the federal government will now target the earnings of ‘folks’ who have earned the money in their bank accounts, and that they, and they alone will determine WHO can most afford to have their income confiscated.)
And if we don’t do any revenue (confiscation) — because you may hear the argument that why not just go ahead and do all the cuts and we can debate the revenue (confiscation) issues in the election — right? You’ll hear that from some Republicans. The problem is, is that if you don’t do the revenues (confiscation), then to get the same amount of savings you’ve got to have more cuts, which means that it’s seniors, or it’s poor kids, or it’s medical researchers, or it’s our infrastructure that suffers. (Apparently without the confiscation of rich peoples wealth then these needy classes MUST suffer, and government has decided that they must in order to get their way.)
And I do not want, and I will not accept, (Barack does not want, and will not accept) a deal in which I am asked to do nothing (a deal in which he and the federal government isn’t able to reach into your wallet), in fact, I’m able to keep hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional income that I don’t need (I Barack Obama will mandate that your extra savings will be taken from you, because I say you have too much and you really don’t need it anyway), while a parent out there who is struggling to figure out how to send their kid to college suddenly finds that they’ve got a couple thousand dollars less in grants or student loans. ( It’s not fair for you to have money in your savings account while there are those that can’t afford to send their kids to college, so I’m going to see to it that your money is taken from you, in order to pay for them.)
That’s what the revenue (confiscation) debate is about. It’s not because I want to raise revenues (confiscate) for the sake of raising revenues (confiscating), or I’ve got some grand ambition to create a bigger government. It’s because if we’re going to actually solve the problem, there are a finite number of ways to do it. And if you don’t have revenues (confiscation), it means you are putting more of a burden on the people who can least afford it. And that’s not fair. (I Barack Obama and the federal government are the only ones that can solve this problem, but in order to do that we have to confiscate the money you have saved and earned, and re-issue it to people that are poorer than you are. It’s the only fair thing to do.) And I think the American people agree with me on that.
Now, this wasn’t a gaffe or a mistake; this was a snapshot of this presidents ideology. It’s classic Marxism, straight up. For those of you who still buy this guys line of thought~ YOU are part of the problem. For those of you still standing on the sidelines and doing nothing to stop him~ YOU are contributing to the problem. And if you do nothing to thwart his progress~ YOU are a socialized Marxist, and will be viewed as the enemy come judgment day. YOU are anti American, and will be dealt with accordingly.

I, Know Who I Am. I, Know Where I Stand. And I, Know Why I Stand There.

The Question here is~ DO YOU?

The Gods of the Copybook Headings

June 11, 2010

     I’m trying something different here to see how an idea pans out. Not that I’m trying to use you as guinea pigs, but it’s a departure from what I usually do. I’m going to attempt to take a classic work of art, and marry it to today’s culture; and see if I can pull it off. Classic poet and writer, Rudyard Kipling wrote a poem back in 1919 titled ‘The Gods of the Copybook Headings’. Now most of us don’t know what Copybooks were, let alone Copybook Headings; so a little history visit would be in order.

      Copybooks were used in schools back at the turn of the century, for students to practice their cursive writing in. It had two solid horizontal lines about an inch apart, and between them was a dashed line. The teacher would write a phrase or sentence at the top of the page as a guide for the student to copy repetitively down the page, over and over; until the student had that pattern engrained and mastered. That initial pre-written phrase was called a ‘heading’…hence the term Copybook Heading.

      OK, now that we’re on the same page I’d like you to read through Kipling’s poem; and afterwards will be a writing of my own in which I try to analyze and interpret his words into an analogy appropriate for today in America. His is a poem, mine will be allegorical.

 ___________________________________

The Gods of the Copybook Headings – Rudyard Kipling – 1919

As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place;
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.

With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”

Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four—
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

 As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man—
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began:—
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will bum,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

 ___________________________________

Chronology of Impending Despair – chaos – 2010

 As I pass through my incarnations in every age and race,
I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place.
Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.

 As we grow older, no matter what our race; we’re led by society into purchasing and investing with our hard earned money. We hand over our cash to those who appear trustworthy; then lace our fingers and clasp our hands, hoping that the market won’t crash, businesses won’t fail, that we’ll still have a job. But cycles come and go, and businesses do fail. Even the most prosperous eventually fall if mismanaged. But when you stop to look around…the machine keeps running, and the system we learned from doesn’t miss a beat. It actually gets stronger as time goes on.

 We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn
That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn:
But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind,
So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.

We were naïve and thirsting for knowledge; looking for someone in leadership to help guide us down the proper path. We believed (thanks to them) that we needed to lean on them because we didn’t know what lay ahead in the path, and they did; that we needed them to guide us to something better. But they let us down. They weren’t uplifting, they lacked vision, and couldn’t think outside the box; they just consumed more power. So, we turned away from them and followed along like sheep with the rest of society; working and slaving away for a someday that never seemed to come. We sent our kids off to school to be taught, because of course; teachers know best how to handle unruly, empty headed little kids. Or so we thought.

 We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace,
Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place;
But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come
That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.

We go through the day to day motions, preoccupied with the task directly at hand in our jobs; finishing up and going to the bar to dust off the day and relax. But while we’re doing these things; that ‘machine’ keeps on moving, in spite of our inactivity to deal with it. They kept teaching our kids what to think, how to think…over and over and over while we were oblivious. We didn’t see the warning signs along the way. We drove and drove that capitalistic, industrial beast for all it was worth; but they had to slow us down with regulation and meddling in our business affairs. After all, there was a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico, and an oil well disaster there too; so what better time to manipulate things in their favor to slow us down and exert their ever growing power? After all, they needed us to be dependent on them for direction; it’s the only way that they can maintain control.

 With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch,
They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch;
They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings;
So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.

 Now the Stilton and Dutch reference was regarding a type of cheese made by the Dutch…but the analogy being made was that despite what they tell us, we know what’s true and what’s not. We know what needs to be done; but we don’t act. They don’t listen to us, tell us that up is down, and down is up; trying to convince us that they knew best, and we’re just too stupid to understand. They’re so out of touch it’s not even funny. So, we gave up waiting on them and took off to the local shopping malls; and spent to our hearts content. We needed something to make us feel better and buying new toys did the trick. More distractions.

 When the Cambrian measures were forming, they promised perpetual peace.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”

 The Cambrian measures was in reference to the bodies of water in Europe that separated land masses…which joined one land mass to another. But the larger picture, in context is that we’re actively being herded into a universal form of government; all encompassing, with the promise of peace and harmony. All we have to do to achieve this is to turn over our weapons and forego the 2nd amendment, by adhering to the U.N. directives set forth for all world citizens. Once they have removed the firearms from our homes, they will have complete control; and force us into this world governance against our will. We’ll be told by the ‘teachers’, the leaders, the masters; to just accept it…to ‘stick to the devil we know’, what we’ve been taught. Sit down and shut up…They know best.

On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life
(Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife)
Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”

 Our foundations were built on truth and honor, freedom and liberty; and those things offered a better way of life. But over time our foundation, our feminian sandstones…have been chipped away at steadily, and eroded to the point where we’ve traded friendships, and bonds with our friends and neighbors. It’s been replaced with the ‘if it feels good, do it’ mentality; sleeping with our neighbors wife or husband, eliminating honor. We’ve become so debased as a culture (driven by the teacher’s and leaders), that faith in God has been cast aside, women are aborting babies; there’s no longer any value placed on human life. If we go against the grain and stand up for what is right and true, we’re maligned and marginalized as crazed bigots and hate mongers; to where we’re being prepared to be culled. The wages of sin is death~…death of common sense perhaps? …Death of a way of life? Or the destruction of a working system to be replaced by what ‘they’ have in mind.

 In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”
 

 

Our Carboniferous Epoch, was our industrial revolution; where we grew and grew and prospered, becoming more wealthy than any other nation. ‘They’ worked diligently, finding ways to rob us of our individual wealth; to redistribute it back out to those that haven’t earned it. The propping up of the recipient class; healthcare, food stamps, welfare, social security etc., has led us to the point where our individual wealth has been decimated in favor of the collective, through social programs; creating a class of people that can’t fend for themselves, reliant solely on ‘them’ for their means of existence. And ‘they’ take it from us to achieve that goal. We’re heading down the path of Chairman Mao and the extermination not only of the human spirit; but Death, if we don’t conform to the collective mentality. If we don’t provide the labor to feed the beast, we’ll be plowed under. They’re actively printing so much money, that our currency can’t possibly withstand the pressure. The dollar ‘has’ to crash and become worthless. It won’t matter how much paper money you hold, because it won’t be able to buy anything. Will we be left to die in the fields of the collective?

 Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew
And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true
That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four—
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.

 Stock market crashes, too big to fail bailouts; everyone deflecting responsibility for the causes of financial demise… Barney Frank, Tim Geithner, Ben Bernanke, Chris Dodd, and the rest of the silver tongued bastards that generated the carnage; slithered away and hid from the public, while legislating, demonizing, deflecting and hoarding power to protect themselves in the process. But we started to wake up and take notice that we were deceived and distracted by sparkling, shiny objects; where two plus two actually did equal four. We’re being told that two plus two is something like thirty seven these days, and ‘they’ figure if they say it long enough and loud enough…that we’ll accept it as truth. Can you explain the ‘new math’ being taught in school? Economics? Why is capitalism not being taught anymore?

 As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man—
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began:—
That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire,
And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;

 One thing remains constant regardless of the era we live in; Truth. Many have tried to dilute and massage the meaning of ‘truth’; but it remains the constant. There truly are only four things certain since Social Progress began: 1. Dogs do return to their vomit; and eat it. 2. Pigs wallow in filth. 3. Indoctrinated idiots will burn their hands in a fire, get bandaged up; and stick their hand right back in the fire again…because they don’t learn their lessons. They keep expecting a different result by maintaining the same path they’ve been on. It’s complete inability to be self sufficient; requiring direction from ‘they’, to exist…because they can’t think or do for themselves.

 And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins
When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins,
As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will bum,
The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!

 Finally 4. Once ‘they’ve’ completed their mission of collective, utopian world government, all individual wealth is confiscated and redistributed to welfare recipients (dependent on the government for their existence), the human spirit is crushed and no personal responsibility for ones own actions; Just as sure as water is wet, and fire burns, we’ll then be right where they want us…ready and compliant, accepting of the scraps that they hand down from on high. And if we refuse~ we’ll be exterminated through mass genocide…it’s been the way of every Socialized dictatorship in human history. Welcome to the Age of Obama!

___________________________________

 Many have come before this president, and have helped to pave the way for what we’re going through right now. It’s incumbent on us to rectify the situation, to stop the beast; to save our children. ‘They’ know that they can’t change ‘our’ minds, which is why they’ve focused so heavily on the indoctrination process in our schools. ‘They’ will achieve their goals not by coming after us, but by coming for our children.

 The ‘They’…The ‘Gods of the Copybook Headings’, are the governmental leaders; and the teachers in our schools that have been employed by the beast to make sure our kids are being taught their narrative. They’re attempting to make sure that our children will pose no threat to them…and actually join them in the effort to fundamentally transform America into a socialistic utopia; which as we know from history, only leads to misery, despair, and eventually; Death. Food for thought.

chAos,

Founder, C4coalition.com

Freedom vs. Liberty (with some STANK on it)

June 6, 2010

Recently I’ve come across individuals that are somewhat confused as to what the differences between freedom and liberty are. So, being the opinionated loudmouth that I am; I thought I’d jot this down as a helpful (yet polarizing) guide to help iron it out.

Freedom, is what you and I each exert as individuals with regards to many facets of our lives independently. We exercise our ‘freedom’ when we choose friends, activities, goods, services, etc. Things that we enjoy in our day-to-day lives. Some examples would include say…Sexual partners amongst consenting adults, what type of car or house we purchase, what toppings go on our pizza, and so on.  Along with these freedoms come…Liberty.

Liberty, is what separates us as individuals; in that, your exercise of freedom doesn’t impact me…and my exercise of freedom doesn’t impact you. Liberation from others actions. That’s liberty. Basically, Your freedom to be you; includes my freedom to be free ‘from’ you. You or I may exercise our freedoms as we see fit, but we have liberty from the consequences visited on each other due to those actions. OK?

Now the polarizing part (and this country isn’t even CLOSE to being polarized enough for me). Some specific freedom and liberty pet peeves of mine come to mind, and since they’re all over the news every day…lets air them out once and for all.

PEEVE: Male homosexual sex. When male (A) decides to place his manhood where male (B) evacuates his bowels…both men are exercising their freedom to be themselves. This means that to protect my liberty, those men should retain the consequences for their actions to themselves; and not reach into my pocket to fund medical treatment or medications to treat any illness or disease that’s generated because of those actions. Correct? Now this doesn’t make me a homophobe, or an uncaring barbarian…just liberated from freedoms that aren’t exercised by me personally. If homosexuals want the freedom to participate in this activity..grrreat~have at it! But don’t come to me for assistance when you contract HIV. Fair enough?

PEEVE: Home Mortgages. When you exercise your freedom and purchase a home…I’m liberated from the responsibility of paying for your home. If you sign YOUR name on a mortgage contract; it’s your responsibility to pay for it…not mine. If you lose your job and can no longer pay for your contractual obligation; file bankruptcy and deal with the consequences of your own actions…don’t come to me for a bailout. Fair enough?

PEEVE: Childbirth (coupled with healthcare). When men and women (or boys and girls more commonly), exercise their freedom to copulate…I’m liberated from the responsibility of paying for every facet of raising that child. If I had wanted the added expense of raising a child, I would have produced one of my own (I have six by the way). If you can’t afford to birth, feed, clothe, raise, and provide medical care for a child…then don’t exercise your freedom of copulation. And if you don’t want me to verbalize my input into how your child is raised, fed, and disciplined…don’t come to me with your hand out. Fair enough? 

There are more examples I could use, but I think I’ve covered enough for you to get the idea of where I’m coming from. I know Who I Am, Where I Stand, and Why I Stand There. I’m completely comfortable with being despised for my viewpoints, as I simply don’t care what anyone thinks about me anymore (I quit caring YEARS ago). As stated earlier, I don’t think this country is polarized enough for my liking. I won’t be happy until political t-shirts are worn every day, political bumper stickers are on every car…and arguments are taking place in the mall parking lots across the country. If boyfriends and girlfriends split up over it, if neighbors quit speaking to each other, if family members don’t come to Thanksgiving dinner… I DON’T CARE. It’s time to start dividing the country in to right and wrong, good and evil, patriot and enemy.

If the progressive left in our society think that their way is best~FINE. You go your way and we on the conservative side will go our way. Let’s split the states up into progressive bastions of the recipient, touchy feely class of people…and conservative enclaves of provider, self-sufficient, free market capitalists; and we’ll see which states rise, and which states fall. Progressives despise, bemoan, castigate, and loathe conservatives…just as conservatives despise, bemoan, castigate, and loathe progressives. BUT REMEMBER…progressives need conservatives to fund the class of people they’ve created…WE don’t need them…not even a little.

Progressives can’t exist without conservatives. WE on the conservative side~don’t need a thing from progressives! NOTHING! My earnings are not yours to have…go earn your own.

chAos,

Founder, C4coaliton.com

I Support Freedom of Speech…but only if you agree with me

April 6, 2010

In 1787 when the Constitution was penned by James Madison, he never felt the necessity to add the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was added due largely to the input of Thomas Jefferson. Madison didn’t see the need for the addition, because he believed that government would never grow so large and oppressive that this list of rights would actually be needed. But, he relented; and in 1789 penned the Bill of Rights; which was later ratified by congress in 1791. He had originally written 12 articles, but congress landed on the final 10 that we have today.

Looking back at that time in history, through the lens of today’s reality; it’s amazing to see just how perceptive the Founding Fathers visions truly were. Madison, was an honorable and decent man that lacked a certain skepticism; but was a true believer. Jefferson, while just as noble and honorable; knew the evil hearts of man when left unbridled by limits. It was Jefferson’s insistence and counsel that brought about the text that we hold onto and cherish today.

The first article (or ‘right’) that was penned, we know as the First Amendment to the Constitution. It states; “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Now at first blush, you would think that this is pretty much straight forward in theory right? But if that were the case, why would it now be getting so butchered and bastardized by individuals in power? By individuals that mean to cause the destruction of American society? Because simply put; they don’t care, and they will do anything in their power to destroy everything we’ve known to be true and real.

Until this year I would have never believed that our basic right to speak freely might actually be in jeopardy. I’ve spoken out in opposition during prior administrations and their meddling with the constitutionality of their agendas and methods; but somehow with this current administration; all of a sudden I’m attacked and called a racist, homophobic, tea bagging, right wing extremist. If you question anything, anything whatsoever; I get shouted down and threatened with a beat down. All of a sudden ‘free speech’ means that you can speak freely; as long as you agree with me…otherwise, I’ll shout, beat, or shut you down. So, I guess that as long as I agree with the Obama agenda, methods, means, and outcomes…will my right to speak freely, truly be honored.

OK…Now, how much of this would we put up with if the president were white? How much of this nonsense, overstepping, belittling, arrogance, ignorance, and stupidity would we tolerate if the president weren’t a half-black man? Seems to me the best thing he’s got going for him is his ethnicity; and his ability to prey on it, to use it to his advantage. I find it odd that he’s a ‘situational’ black man. When it serves his purpose (in the media or otherwise) and someone disagrees with him, all of a sudden he’s being scrutinized because he’s black. But…when he needs to win people over to ascribe to his ideology; all of a sudden you see pictures of his white mother being tossed all over the place.

The progressive, socialist, communist left wants to silence me whenever possible, by whatever means necessary. If I go to speak at a venue and they don’t like what I have to say; I get shouted down. If I support a constitutional viewpoint (anti socialist), I get threatened. And if I express dissent from a left wing ideology, I must be a racist. So, freedom of speech is dead; unless you’re a communist? How does that work exactly?

Our predecessors worked so hard to build the things we take for granted and overlook on a daily basis; and it’s about to slip away unless we make a choice. We now need to choose Right or Wrong…Liberty or Tyranny…Freedom or Oppression. The time has come for all good men and women to do something about it. Will you stand with…or against? The choice is yours.

I’m maligned and vilified for my beliefs and views, not because they’re scared of me…but because of those that I may help to inspire into action. For every outspoken voice, there are possible hundreds or thousands that can be persuaded by the information; and that’s what they fear. So, speak up and be heard; your voice just may impact another.

Be it known right here, right now; I will not go quietly into the abyss of socialized communism.

To silence me ~ They will have to kill me!

chAos,
Founder, C4coalition.com

The Eradication and Enslavement of the American Person

March 15, 2010
EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

This is going to be a sort of ‘nuts and bolts’ blog, which may be a tad dry to some people…but I’ll try to dress it up to keep it entertaining. The items to be covered are: The perversion of the We The People collective mentality vs. the American Person individualized mentality, and the new slavery of the provider class on the collective plantation by the recipient class in the new role of master. I’ll also say up front that this won’t be very politically correct, and to steal a phrase from a friend; this will actually be ‘politically defiant’. That said…take a stroll with me through some rationality. I’m providing the backdrop of the portions of the Constitution in play here, and I reject any notion that it’s being used as a ‘right wing talking point’. Reciting and listing the contents of the Constitution are not talking points…it’s fact based analysis. Once explained, I defy anyone to actually be able to win a contradictory debate on the issues.  FYI.. Article 1, Section 8 is commonly referred to as the ’18 enumerated powers’ of congress.

Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 7 – Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 8 – Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Amendment 13 – Slavery Abolished

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Ok…so now the actual blog.

Congress is proposing a seldom used bill passage process known as Reconciliation. Reconciliation is reserved for bills regarding budget items. The healthcare bill is being treated as a ‘budget’ bill in order to sidestep congressional rules, to allow passage against public opinion. Bills originate in the house of representatives; the senate can concur but not amend house bills; and the House can’t amend a Senate budget bill.  So, this proposed bill is thereby unconstitutional right out of the gate. Now, dictating purchase of any product or service, mandating nationwide enslavement of the tax ‘payer’ for the betterment of the tax ‘eater’, and government injecting itself into the health insurance market as a participant with the role of player/referee; is all unconstitutional. On this note David Axlerod stated in interview with Tom Brokaw that the people don’t care about that…they want an up or down vote. In other words the people want what they want, and that’s all there is to it. He is factually and ideologically wrong. 50.1% of the population doesn’t dictate to the 49.9% out of sheer numerological superiority. This is a democratically functioning political process, layered on a republican form of government as established by the founders. Robert (potato head) Gibbs said in his interview with Chris Wallace, that once passed this healthcare bill will be the ‘law of the land’…so basically just accept it, because we’re doing it anyway. I think not sir. I guarantee that there will be hell to pay by these elitists, when their judgment day comes at the hands of the citizenry. ‘No Quarter’ will take on a whole new meaning. Think ‘Prolapse’; and if you don’t know what that means~ Look it up.

Now, if passed against the will of the American Persons…the result will eventually be this: The popular third world doctors currently employed in the system will be the only doctors available to run this system. It must be noted that as a prerequisite of retaining their work visa’s, said doctors are mandated to provide governmental service.

Hence, successful domestic doctors will start up privately owned hospitals for paying members only; void of an emergency room. You will be left with inferior, substandard care as provided by the government, and government funded doctors. The leftists proclaim that healthcare is a human right. They use emotional, anecdotal stories; elevating themselves as doing “Gods work”. This “Gods work” however comes at the expense of another party; namely the forced, coerced, taxable class. You’ll hear the argument that ‘Jesus would want healthcare for all’. And while that may be true, I doubt that Jesus would want that coverage to come at the tip of a Roman spear. Forced compassion does more damage to the initiative than they realize. This argument is a dishonest, blatant manipulation intended to achieve a required outcome. It’s a new slavery on a plantation owned by the recipient; a slavery of the taxpayer..forced to pay for ‘others’. Where is the ‘Liberty, Freedom, and Justice’ in that? And if you think this scenario is bad~ just wait until amnesty takes effect. It’s federally mandated wealth redistribution that levels the playing field. All needs will be met in the collective, by those fortunate enough to have enough money to take from. It’s the new slavery.

What is a human being expected to provide for themselves anymore? Under this proposal, the doctor has no rights, the individual has no rights, the government has empowered itself illegally to turn the tables in favor of non-contributing tax eaters, recipients, patients. If you’re a middle class, suburban voter that voted for Obama….this is your fault. You have voted damnation to yourself. So when you get victimized by the system that you voted on yourself, I don’t want to hear your whining when the sky falls on you. Thanks for betraying us…the American Person.

I know that this blog will make me the ‘A-hole’, bad person and selfish, capitalist; but I can live with that. I will watch you bleed out…with compassion.

Pornographic Salvation

March 15, 2010

EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

I stopped to ponder the current level of acrimony with regards to how our elected officials are conducting themselves, and it became apparent that the vast majority are nothing more than sock puppets looking out solely for themselves. Based on rational thought and clarity, I dissected these buffoons and came to the realization that their conduct is nothing more than a self serving, self important, egotistical pomposity. You may ask what I’m talking about; and it’s this: These people spend the majority of their time patting themselves on the back, lobbying for the nearest microphone, stuffing their election war chests, and ‘saying’ things that they think the people want to hear. They no longer have any conviction, honor, integrity, valor, or wisdom. They legislate based on the mental capacity of their base voting block, and pander to the fringes; irrespective of where they stand personally on an issue. It’s all in an effort to harness power and cash, to the demise of the actual voting populace; elevating themselves to the status of ‘Lords’.

Back room deals, power brokering, lavish fundraisers (funded by special interests), and unethical gaming are all now commonplace with these individuals; and they have no concern for what their constituents actually have to say about anything. They seem to think that they simply know better than we do, and we’re just too stupid to understand that they’re saving us from ourselves. They’ve become so ‘drunk’ with power and influence that they actually believe that they’re invincible; it’s a veritable sadomasochistic political orgy. ‘God Complex’ doesn’t begin to frame the problem, but it’s a start.

I don’t care if they’re left or right, republican or democrat, black or white, gay or straight; they all SUCK! What we’ve got right now, in this place and time; is an unbridled obscenity of spending, and governmental control of nearly every facet of our lives. And they charge us through exorbitant taxation to fund these oppressive programs that they claim the people want and need. The only people that want these programs are those that can’t (or won’t) provide and do for themselves. Excessive taxation of the persons contributing the funds simply doesn’t work; and it never has. All excessive taxation does is to lower the effort level of the contributor; because they no longer see any inherent value in succeeding only to see the fruits of their labor confiscated and given to undeserving, worthless individuals that won’t put down the crack pipe long enough to even say Thank You. Thank You, provider. Thank You, contributor. Thank You, person that gives me free stuff. NO! It’s not Thank You…It’s ‘F’ You, you owe me. And these politicians are guilty of sodomizing us against our will. No kiss on the neck, no pillow talk, no gentle caressing; just bend us over the countertop, and ram it home. Somehow we are to accept our role as providing for those that won’t help themselves out of their own plight. And our beloved political class (left and right) go out of their way to enable and elevate the recipient class, while castigating the provider class; and I’m sick of it.

We’re not having this ‘Healthcare Bill’ shoved down our throats; we’re having it rammed up some other body orifice (a little further south). We have the liberal democrats devising and manipulating a healthcare bill that less than 20% of the public wants. Coupled with that, it’s a bill that overtakes 1/6th of the economy in the process. On the other side we have progressive republicans that want to ‘negotiate’ for a resolution, under the guise of being more in line with ‘the people’. What they’re all failing to appreciate and comprehend is that any governmental interjection is unconstitutional…but they simply don’t care. They think that they know better than the founders, and that they’re more enlightened and compassionate intellectually. I’ve got news for you…when you take a bad idea, and try to marry it to a good idea; you end up with a mediocre hodgepodge of SUCK! A bad idea…that sucks a little less. A compromised ‘agreement’ is worse than dishonest; it’s an attempt to ‘fool’ the public (supposedly for it’s own good), but essentially it’s merely a power grab to maintain their elected seat. It’s unconstitutional in its scope, it falls outside the 18 enumerated powers granted to the federal government, they’re rewriting the Constitution with every ‘illegal’ bill that’s passed; and they don’t care. They get away with it because the majority of the citizenry isn’t educated in all things Constitutional, and they love the handouts that these legislators promise. It’s sort of like the lords of medieval times tossing the masses bits of bread and meat from on high. If they’re able to keep the populace hungry enough, the masses will flock to the hand that feeds them; and be grateful for the little that they do receive from the elitist class.

Thus far I’ve been called an extremist, racist, homophobe, zealot, ideologue, and white elitist. And it amazes me that simply being an originalist when it comes to the Constitution, deems me out of step with the commonplace perceived logic of the day. If I support the abolishment of the Medicare/Medicaid system, the exertion of states rights over the federal government, elimination of the Social Security Administration and the Federal Reserve; I’m immediately called a fascist. Every one of these programs were pitched and touted in their inception as necessary organizations, but under false pretenses. But now that the overwhelming majority of people in the country are accustomed and used-to the existence of these institutions (and the perverse, mal-administered way they’ve been employed), so they blindly follow perceived norms of societal acceptance; no matter the oppression generated by doing so. This has to stop…and if I’m derided for speaking out against what’s going on and the individuals that enable it…then so be it. I’m tired of apologizing for my stance on the issues, for feeling bad for having that position, and I’ve finally embraced the position of simply not caring for the plight of the supposed poor and oppressed. If you’re thirsty, get off your arse and out of the desert; and go find water. If you’re hungry, go and offer yourself up to trade labor for something to eat. And if you can’t afford to feed your children, then either quit having sex and creating mouths you can’t feed; or use some form of viable birth control, because I’m tired of feeding your kids out of my wallet. You created your problems; You go and figure a way out of it on your own…it’s not my responsibility, it’s yours. If you come to me for help, I will require something in return for the assistance. If you don’t want to be asked for something in return; don’t ask for my help.

For far too long I’ve remained silent, generally docile and un-confrontational; but that time has passed. I now know Who I Am…Where I Stand…And Why I Stand There. The Pornographic spending spree, for the Salvation of mankind…ends at my doorstep. I only hope that by writing this, that I can help to enable others to focus on themselves and their households…and learn to say ‘NO’ to the governmental confiscation of their individual wealth, to redistribute it to others that you have no interest in supporting. If I’ve offended you…Good; it’s about time somebody did. Now go take care of yourself…I’m Done.

chAos,

Founder, C4coalition.com

The Problem with Equal Opportunity Employment

February 14, 2010
EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

To assume the role of ‘superior’ to any race of peoples by removing obstacles, is to thwart initiative. And ensuring their hiring based on skin tone, is an insult to their ability to achieve that goal on their own. It’s the same as telling someone that they’re too stupid or uneducated to acquire the position based on merit and intelect.   Soft racism hurts all of society.  chAos

 

It’s not often that I decide to tackle accepted truth vs. actual truth issues, but I needed to ruminate, so here goes. An accepted truth is what society over time has conjured up in order to shift individual thoughts on a topic, and continuously repeat the desired definition relentlessly; until their answer becomes the default truth on the topic. An actual truth, is what the real story is. Pushing back against accepted truths is generally painful in the realm of public opinion because one is immediately ridiculed and deemed extreme for failing to conform to the assumed logic. After all, who am I to go against settled science as it were; but here I am doing it again.

     We’ve all heard the term Equal Opportunity Employment, and over time it’s become the ‘tool’ most often used when it comes to ‘leveling’ the playing field in favor of those individuals that would otherwise not gain meaningful, sustained employment. Initially it was used to force employers to not ‘shut out’ any particular race of people from their workforce through sanctioned bigotry. Noble? Perhaps; as designed. But it’s been perverted over time to simply turn the workforce into a mediocre, blended mass of minimized productivity.

     College campuses across the U.S. have been offering courses in diversity for decades, but not until recently has a school actually offered white students a financial break to attract them to attend; in an effort to help with awareness relative to social justice. Now I don’t know exactly what the curriculum is, but I sense something bad at play here. It just doesn’t smell right. When you think of diversity, where does it generally apply? Mainly in businesses that require a structured labor force; manufacturing, restaurants, service industry, food service, etc.

     Now ask yourself; What about sports franchises? What about wall street or the financial sector? The NBA and NFL for example seem to have a lopsided black to white ratio don’t they? As does the NBA correct? Now what about baseball? The MLB seems to have a higher quantity of Latin and Hispanic players, true or false? OK, now does that mean that we need diversity programs in our major sports franchises to more ‘equitably’ distribute the available team positions? Do you think the players in those sports are really concerned with diversity?…or are they more concerned with Winning and being successful?

     It seems to me that Drew Brees could care less what color person he throws the ball to as long as it’s a completed pass and moves the ball down the field toward the endzone. And I hardly think that Reggie Bush will turn down a key block on the line of scrimmage because the lineman happens to be white. It’s about winning the game, being successful, and putting fans in the stands to make your team as profitable as possible; thereby ensuring your paycheck as a player. The same should hold true in any business model; it’s about the bottom line and the success of your business in competition against the other companies in your chosen product line. Success drives any business, not the skin color of your workers. Whatever business you’re running, you want the best of the best to ensure your success…plain and simple.

     When you start sacrificing quality and efficiency, for quotas and expedience…your business suffers the potential for diminished returns; thereby jeopardizing your continued viability in the marketplace. One should never get a job with a company simply based on the color of their skin, their religion, or any other factor besides  their qualifications, knowledge, and effort. Anything less would be…uncivilized.

     You see…When we fall into the trappings of the ‘accepted’ truth laid before us, we short change ourselves and our productivity; thus stifling our dependence on ourselves for our own survival and upkeep. But when we embrace the ‘actual’ truth, we have a much better chance of success…and we just might meet some really cool people along the way that are just as motivated; no matter their skin color. Food for Thought.

chAos

Founder, C4coalition.com

Embracing the Bonds of Slavery once again

February 6, 2010
EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

 

“A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences” ; such as birth control and access to abortions.  John Holdren, presidential advisor.

           

           During the early 20th century many philosophical evils were masked to hide their bearers in safe haven amongst the supposed intellectual elite, and to this day I can’t understand the overwhelming percentage of the black population that herald their followers to present day. If I were cynical I would say that it appears that the black community by and large has suicidal tendencies, and would prefer the bonds of slavery and extermination over freedom and liberty; along with self reliance. If you trek through the history of the progressive movement and look to their ‘founders’, the logical explanation would be what I just stated; and then we would ask…why? Why do the majority of blacks vote for people that have their extermination, if not impediment in mind; simply to accrue power? You may think me wrong on this, but I’ll back up every statement; and then you can draw your own conclusion.

          Woodrow Wilson was probably the most blatanty racist and whitely supreme in his ‘progressive’ thought and outward actions. Upon inauguration Wilson fired any black federal employees, and segregated the Navy; which up until then had always been desegregated. This naval policy stood in effect into the 1950’s. He held a private viewing of the movie “The Birth of a Nation”, which helped to spawn the modern KKK movement that still rears it’s head from time to time. Wilson stated frankly The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.” Wilson stood by those words and in fact, the Klans popularity thrived thanks in part to the support it received from the highest office in the land.

               Exhibit 2 offers up Margaret Sanger. Ah, Yes…Margaret Sanger , the Birth of Feminism. Stalwart for womens rights and touted as the goddess  of the abortionists and planned parenthood organizations across the country.  In March 1925 at an international birth control gathering in New York City, Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL),  warned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The ABLC, along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

               Other Sanger colleagues included self avowed racists. Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate.  He wrote of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. This guy was a Nazi enthusiast who espoused  the eugenics of the Third Reich as “scientific” and “humanitarian.” And another Sanger associate, Dr. Harry Laughlin, spoke of purifying America’s human “breeding stock” and of purging America’s “bad strains.” Among those “strains” were “shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South.”

               Sanger herself spoke of sterilizing those she condemned as “unfit,” this was a plan that she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.”  She also spoke of those individuals who were “irresponsible and reckless,” this class included people ” whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers.” Further contending, “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” Many blacks constituted a segment of the population that Sanger considered “unfit.”
               Planned Parenthood’ and it’s apologists try to distance themselves from  the eugenics and birth control movements; history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme was expressly highlighted in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published the following articles: “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), along with many others. Now, there’s more on this woman; but to continue would require “volumes” of written essay. I think I’ve covered enough on her to make my case.

            Next on the list would be? Justice to the Supreme Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.  Holmes wrote for the majority in the 1927 Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell, upholding the right of state governments to forcibly sterilize “feebleminded’’ citizens as he put it:

               “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough.’’

 Holmes considered such brutal thinking progressive and enlightened;  Stating to a friend he said “it gave me pleasure, to pen a decision upholding compulsory sterilization.”

What fantastically, fabulous,  forward thinking~…my god.

               Moving on here, lets go with Richard Nixon and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Nixon was meeting with an aide in the White House on Jan. 23, 1973. When the conversation  turned to the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision the day before, Nixon said it was “necessary’’ in some cases, such as interracial pregnancies. “There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white; Or rape.’’

               Ginsburg’s had these chilling words: Referring to the Hyde Amendment (which bars medicaid funds for abortions), Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. . . But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way.’’

Populations that we don’t want to have too many of ?– who would those be, exactly? Minorities? The poor? The handicapped? She said this in 1980 by the way.

               Now Sanger called for “immediate, stern, and definite’’ action to solve the “problem of the feeble-minded and the menace of the moron’’; those that she regarded as the “dead weight of human waste.’’ She was absolutely opposed to providing free medical care to “slum mothers,’’ because that “would facilitate . . . maternity among the very classes in which the absolute necessity is to discourage it.’’ Although not a racist in her personal life, there is no denying the racial aspect of her campaign. In 1939, for example, she launched the “Negro Project’’ which was aimed at curtailing black childbirth in the South.

               Date: 1993. Decades after Wilson and Sanger; the eugenicist mindset lives on. As co-counsel for the appellants in Roe, Ron Weddington wrote in a letter  to President-elect Bill Clinton in January 1993, challenging him to “start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country’’, not through “some sort of mass extinction, but with massive birth control and abortion. Condoms alone won’t do it . . . Government is also going to have to provide vasectomies, tubal ligations, and abortion . . . We don’t need more poor babies.’’

               Today (2010), abortion ends more black lives than heart disease, cancer, accidents, AIDS, and violent crime combined.   And more than half of all black pregnancies in America end in abortion. Clearly that wasn’t what Justice Ginsburg meant by “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.’’ Or was it? Really?…hmmm, perhaps indeed.

OK…Lets take a history break here. Did You Know? In 1964, During the Civil Rights Bill debate; The chief opponents were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, of later Watergate fame, Albert Gore Sr., and Robert Byrd. Senator Byrd, a former Klansman whom Democrats still call “the conscience of the Senate”, filibustered against the civil rights bill for fourteen straight hours before the final vote. The House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 126, a vote in which 79% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voted yes. The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats and only 6 Republicans voting no. President Johnson signed the new Civil Rights Act into law on July 2, 1964.

               I know this is getting long, and thanks for bearing with me. Given the history I’ve outlined thus far, why in Gods name does the majority of the black community feel compelled to blindly give their alegience to people that clearly want them eliminated? Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger, Justice Olive Wendell Holmes, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Al Gore Sr., Robert Byrd; all of a bygone generation…coupled with the ‘new breed’ of progressives to pick up their causes.

               During the run up to the 2008 election, Hillary Clinton mocked people with her “I ain’t no ways tired” black southern drawl; and later high praise for Margaret Sanger. Joe Bidens “clean and articulate” comment, Harry Reids “Light Skinned” and Lacking “Negro Dialect” comments on Obama. Even the Media with Chris Matthews velvet draped racism saying that “I forgot he was black for an hour” after the state of the union address, referring to the president.

               These champion progressive liberals that the black population swarms around and carries water for, have done nothing but try to keep them herded in manageable, needy groups in the inner cities…but they’ve also been the ones driving the ‘bus full o’ negroes’ right off the economic cliff by keeping them unemployed, uneducated, and unable to think for themselves out of a sense of entitlement.

The progressives are the new slave owners of our society; laughing all the way back to their elected seat of power, and too the bank in the process.

chAos,

Founder, c4coalition.com

Inconvenient Truths and the Word Police

February 6, 2010
EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

     

 

     I got to thinking the other day about how political correctness has gone to extremes to pit different segments of society against one another. Mainly, what’s happened is that a system has been set up where two equal parties are split into two categories; victims and offenders. In some cases a person may be offended because someone has truly said something offensive, with the intent to injure; that’s true victimization. But what’s been happening more often lately is the “Injury by default” mentality, where a person gets upset and offended by something; simply because they can. Being injured by cause, and being injured out of convenience are completely different scenarios entirely.

     Now lets run this out to it’s logical conclusion. Let’s say I’m a pharmaceutical manufacturer and I’ve developed the cure for something incurable; lets pick AIDS. Now I’ve painstakingly poured hours, months and years into developing  just the right combination of ingredients and chemicals, put my knowledge to work for the betterment of man, and put on the market a pill that will cure AIDS. Great! Everybody wants it, I’ve priced it at a rate that’s affordable to most, make it available to doctors and patients, and all is looking up. All of the media outlets are clamoring to have me on the air to praise my efforts, and world leaders invite me to come speak at various gatherings. Fantastic.

     But there’s a problem. I’m getting hate mail and protesters are outside my door; because of the name I chose for the drug. I had initially landed on three possible choices for the name (Fagocil, Homicin, and Queerox); I chose Fagocil, and now I’m being protested by irate homosexual men, congress is being lobbied by NAMBLA, and the ACLU is threatening a lawsuit if I don’t change the name. What was once fawning media in the beginning has now turned into vitriolic OpEd pieces, crucifying me as a homophobic, sexist, bigot. What to do, what to do.

     So what should I do? Should I change the name? Would the drug work any differently? Would it be any more or less effective with a different name? Should I hold my ground with my intellectual property rights? I mean after all, no one else has the knowledge to create this drug. Who does the government think they are that they can come to me and try to impose it’s will with regards to my business anyway? What if I simply stopped making the drug? Would people intentionally deny themselves a cure because they’re offended by the simple ‘name’ of the product available to save their lives? Chew on that for a little bit while I move on.

     Say I owned a business; a bakery. A niche bakery that catered to Conservative Americans. Our creations had patriotic slogans on the icing, American flags, pictures of the founding fathers, etc. Business is booming and  I need to hire more help to keep up with demand. I place an ad in the local newspaper, and start setting up interviews. I end up hiring a young woman and a young man based on their specific skills and capabilities, as they’ll be able to hit the ground running, and keep up with the demand. We’ve agreed on a per hour wage, gone over the duties and all is well. Now, at the end of the first week the woman comes to me and informs me that she’s somewhat offended by the slogans on our ‘victory’ cake, because it has a rebel flag on it and her ancestors were black; so she views the design as racially charged and in fact ‘racist’. We go round and round on the issue, and she ends up quitting because she finds it too ‘offensive’ to work in that environment. Later that month I get a notice in the mail that I’m being sued for harassment in a ‘hostile’ work environment. I either need to change my best selling cake design, or face legal action. So what should be done?

     This is another example of ‘convenient victimization’, she knew what the designs and conditions were before she accepted the employment offered, prior to accepting the job; but once hired, developed a ‘problem’. There’s no doubt that people can make crude, hurtful remarks intentionally; and that’s wrong, and should be dealt with on a situational basis. But, if someone is simply being a goof and not intending any malice; it should be left alone. It’s time to grow up and put your righteous indignation back on the shelf; and set about getting things done instead of finding a scapegoat for your self imposed inferiority.

chAos,

Founder, c4coalition.com