The Eradication and Enslavement of the American Person

EXPLOSIVE SOLUTIONS FOR TROUBLING TIMES

Explosive Solutions for Troubling Times

This is going to be a sort of ‘nuts and bolts’ blog, which may be a tad dry to some people…but I’ll try to dress it up to keep it entertaining. The items to be covered are: The perversion of the We The People collective mentality vs. the American Person individualized mentality, and the new slavery of the provider class on the collective plantation by the recipient class in the new role of master. I’ll also say up front that this won’t be very politically correct, and to steal a phrase from a friend; this will actually be ‘politically defiant’. That said…take a stroll with me through some rationality. I’m providing the backdrop of the portions of the Constitution in play here, and I reject any notion that it’s being used as a ‘right wing talking point’. Reciting and listing the contents of the Constitution are not talking points…it’s fact based analysis. Once explained, I defy anyone to actually be able to win a contradictory debate on the issues.  FYI.. Article 1, Section 8 is commonly referred to as the ’18 enumerated powers’ of congress.

Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 7 – Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Article 1 – The Legislative Branch
Section 8 – Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

Amendment 13 – Slavery Abolished

1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Ok…so now the actual blog.

Congress is proposing a seldom used bill passage process known as Reconciliation. Reconciliation is reserved for bills regarding budget items. The healthcare bill is being treated as a ‘budget’ bill in order to sidestep congressional rules, to allow passage against public opinion. Bills originate in the house of representatives; the senate can concur but not amend house bills; and the House can’t amend a Senate budget bill.  So, this proposed bill is thereby unconstitutional right out of the gate. Now, dictating purchase of any product or service, mandating nationwide enslavement of the tax ‘payer’ for the betterment of the tax ‘eater’, and government injecting itself into the health insurance market as a participant with the role of player/referee; is all unconstitutional. On this note David Axlerod stated in interview with Tom Brokaw that the people don’t care about that…they want an up or down vote. In other words the people want what they want, and that’s all there is to it. He is factually and ideologically wrong. 50.1% of the population doesn’t dictate to the 49.9% out of sheer numerological superiority. This is a democratically functioning political process, layered on a republican form of government as established by the founders. Robert (potato head) Gibbs said in his interview with Chris Wallace, that once passed this healthcare bill will be the ‘law of the land’…so basically just accept it, because we’re doing it anyway. I think not sir. I guarantee that there will be hell to pay by these elitists, when their judgment day comes at the hands of the citizenry. ‘No Quarter’ will take on a whole new meaning. Think ‘Prolapse’; and if you don’t know what that means~ Look it up.

Now, if passed against the will of the American Persons…the result will eventually be this: The popular third world doctors currently employed in the system will be the only doctors available to run this system. It must be noted that as a prerequisite of retaining their work visa’s, said doctors are mandated to provide governmental service.

Hence, successful domestic doctors will start up privately owned hospitals for paying members only; void of an emergency room. You will be left with inferior, substandard care as provided by the government, and government funded doctors. The leftists proclaim that healthcare is a human right. They use emotional, anecdotal stories; elevating themselves as doing “Gods work”. This “Gods work” however comes at the expense of another party; namely the forced, coerced, taxable class. You’ll hear the argument that ‘Jesus would want healthcare for all’. And while that may be true, I doubt that Jesus would want that coverage to come at the tip of a Roman spear. Forced compassion does more damage to the initiative than they realize. This argument is a dishonest, blatant manipulation intended to achieve a required outcome. It’s a new slavery on a plantation owned by the recipient; a slavery of the taxpayer..forced to pay for ‘others’. Where is the ‘Liberty, Freedom, and Justice’ in that? And if you think this scenario is bad~ just wait until amnesty takes effect. It’s federally mandated wealth redistribution that levels the playing field. All needs will be met in the collective, by those fortunate enough to have enough money to take from. It’s the new slavery.

What is a human being expected to provide for themselves anymore? Under this proposal, the doctor has no rights, the individual has no rights, the government has empowered itself illegally to turn the tables in favor of non-contributing tax eaters, recipients, patients. If you’re a middle class, suburban voter that voted for Obama….this is your fault. You have voted damnation to yourself. So when you get victimized by the system that you voted on yourself, I don’t want to hear your whining when the sky falls on you. Thanks for betraying us…the American Person.

I know that this blog will make me the ‘A-hole’, bad person and selfish, capitalist; but I can live with that. I will watch you bleed out…with compassion.

One Response to “The Eradication and Enslavement of the American Person”

  1. A Big Fat Slob Says:

    Interesting thoughts.

    Here’s a fundamental problem that I see with your exegesis — the reconciliation procedure is an internal Senate rule, not a Constitutional prerogative. So what and how it is used is entirely up to the Chambers.

    As far as Budget bill provisions of the Constitution go, you are largely correct. However, you overstate it when you say that the Senate Health Insurance Reform Bill is being treated as a “budget bill”. You overstate as a matter of definition and you also overstate the Constitutional impact.

    First, on the definition. The Senate reform legislation is not being separately treated as a budget matter. Only the reconciliation measures are being treated that way — and the reconciliation bill originated, you will recall, in the House.

    But, even were you correct, it does not rise to a level of Constitutional issue. The Constitution does not require that all budget legislation originate in the House — it requires that all Revenue bills originate there. But it further allows for the Senate to propose and amend the same. Therefore, even if the Senate reform measure were treated as primarily or exclusively revenue-generating, then it can be understood as a proposal to the House and, I think would pass Constitutional muster that way.

    Even if I were all wrong in all of this — I think the best measure of the Constitutionality of the process is that none of the Republicans, in either Chamber, challenged the Constitutionality of the procedure (as opposed to the substance) of the reform legislation.

Leave a comment